Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing (epiphany) of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;  Titus 2:13


divinity of the Church as New Creatures and light bearers to the brethren. Its being of beaten work represents the molding of heart and mind into beautiful and useful qualities and attainments in the light-bearers by the Spirit, Word and providences of God, more particularly by the last in their tribulatory aspects. The expression, "unto the base thereof and unto the flowers thereof," as our Pastor explained, types that the Church as light-bearer to the brethren is throughout beautiful in thought and character and fruitful in good works. This is the way God designed the Church to be made ("according unto the pattern which Jehovah had shown Moses"), since all of us who are of Her "are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained [arranged] that we should walk in them" (Eph. 2: 10). With this reflection we may well close our study of the Gospel-Age Moses and Aaron as Truth Receiver and Giver. Certainly its lessons have been deep, clear, refreshing and upbuilding. Certainly they are calculated to increase our love and reverence for God and Christ, and our appreciation of the great privileges that they give us as Truth receivers and dispensers, and that because God is the Source and Jesus is the Agent of these privileges, as this typical study proves. "Praise God from whom all blessings flow … and always in His Son rejoice!"


(1) What was Dan's position in relation to the tabernacle? What was an ancestral peculiarity in the three tribes to the north of the tabernacle? What was it as respects Dan and Naphtali? What figure was presumably on the standard of the camp of Dan? Why? What proves that Dan types the Baptists? What does the word Dan mean? Why was it given—type and antitype? How, compared with other denominations, do the Baptists stand related to the Little Flock? How is this typed?


(2) Who was the prince of Dan? What does his name mean? How does this apply antitypically? What conspired to make antitypical Ahiezer one of brotherly helpfulness?



What was the name of Ahiezer's father? What did this name mean? How did it apply antitypically to the crown-lost leaders of the Baptist Church?


(3) Among what people did the pertinent Little Flock movement originate and become sectarianized? Who was its main crown-lost leader? How long did it remain among that people? Who was its first English-speaking leader? Into how many and what parties did its English branch divide? Who were their respective leaders, and who was the reorganizer of one of them? Who was its American organizer? Who was a more recent crown-lost leader of British Baptists?


(4) What two doctrines are not the stewardship doctrines of the Baptist Church? Why are they sometimes so regarded? What feature did the stewardship doctrine have, superior to any in these two doctrines? What was its stewardship doctrine? What do they not think that repentance and faith do? What did they insist was necessary to membership among God's peoples? Against what two doctrines did they protest as related to their stewardship doctrine? In how far were they right? Why? What did their stewardship doctrine really mean? What characteristic did this doctrine have? What does faith-justification really make one? What mistake do Baptists make on it? What was the reason for this mistake? When only could the entire subject be properly seen and fully explained?


(5) What are not the stewardship doctrine of the Baptists? What do they designate as their central— stewardship—doctrine? What definition of conversion did they reject as incomplete? What do they regard as a complete definition? What is in reality its complete definition? What two graces are involved in the Baptist view of conversion? Which is chiefly so? How is this related to the North of the antitypical Tabernacle? Why are they the first denomination in that position? Why are the Presbyterian, Greek Catholic and Lutheran Churches the chief denominations on their respective sides of the antitypical Tabernacle?


(6) Why did the stewardship doctrine of the Baptist Church lead to the emphasis on adult baptism and immersion? Who only should undergo symbolic baptism?



What effect does this have on infant baptism? From what two times was infant baptism denied? What was not at first insisted upon as the exclusive symbol? When and where did this insistence begin? How long after the Baptist sect was organized was this? What two great contributions has the Baptist Church made to Christendom? How so? Who brought the first of these to America? Who started the second? When? What prophecy and sign did this fulfill? What other consideration led to the advocacy of the first of these contributions?


(7) What phenomenon do we find in the Lord's dealings as to the use of servants in starting the twelve Little Flock movements which were later perverted into sects? What are the names of these twelve pairs of Little Flock servants? How did the assisting brothers compare with the twelve leaders?


(8) Who was the Little Flock leader of the movement that was perverted into the Baptist Church? What were his birth and death places and dates? What was he as a scholar, cleric and professor? Where did he function as a cleric? When did he become a Protestant? What did he immediately begin to preach? What city did he shortly visit and what reformer did he temporarily convert to his view? When and why did the latter recede from this position? What did he then become? What were Hubmaier's subsequent activities at Zurich and Waldshut? What did the Austrian government do as to his Waldshut activities? What two things did he then do?


(9) What were his attitude and work as to the German peasants' grievances and their violence? What resulted to them through their disregard of his advice? What did he receive at Easter, 1525, and shortly thereafter administer to others? How did this affect his relations with Zwingli? What did they do to one another? What event happened at Waldshut in December, 1525? What was its effect on Hubmaier? Whither did he flee? What did he there do? Under what influences? What did he do on being freed? What part did Zwingli have in this affair?


(10) Whither did Hubmaier go in July, 1526? What did he find here and accomplish? What did Moravia and Nikolsburg become to his disciples? Why did they go there? Of what were their persecutors antitypical? What



special work did Hubmaier here do? What was the character of his writings and of himself as a reformer? How was he in comparison and contrast with Luther, Zwingli and Cranmer? What happened to him and his wife in July, 1527, and March, 1528?


(11) What is the character of the persecution that he and his brethren experienced? With what evils, and why, were they blamed? What kind of rulers persecuted them? What are the features of their persecution in Switzerland? Germany? How did they for the most part suffer? How many were martyred in various dependencies of Austria and in Austria itself? What kind of brethren were undoubtedly among these martyrs? What effect did these persecutions have?


(12) What Muenster evils brought the Anabaptists into great disrepute? Where did some of them find a refuge? Who here became their leader? What did he do with them? When did he begin this? What did he do in their defense? What followed thereupon? Describe his subsequent activities. Where else were the Baptists sectarianized? What, as to these, did Rachel's cries for vindication type in this history?


(13) What are not the Baptists' stewardship doctrine? What is it? What is its characteristic? Why? How did they later view this doctrine in relation to immersion? Why did they not see the full Truth on these matters? How do they stand relatively to the other denominations to the Truth on this matter? What advantage did this give their crown-lost leaders?


(14) What did Ahiezer offer? What did his charger represent? From what standpoint? What, more than in their doctrine on it, does conversion imply? What limited the compass of his charger, bowl and spoon? What did his charger correct? How extensive were his corrections? How did they compare as to extension with those of antitypical Abidan's corrections? What does this consideration prompt us to omit in this article? To what will we limit our discussion of antitypical Ahiezer's charger?


(15) What is meant by his offering his charger? What clerical evils flowing out of the doctrine of the Divine right of the clergy did he correct? What kingcraft evils flowing out of the doctrine of the Divine right of kings



did he correct? What evils of officials and aristocrats, flowing out of the doctrine of Divine right of the nobility and capital, did he correct? What was the doctrinal source of these evils? How did these evils affect certain fanatical and unconsecrated hangers-on among the early Anabaptists?


(16) What other classes of evils did he correct? From what standpoint? How did he do this as to pride? Love of human approval? Ease? Life? Contentiousness? Vindictiveness? Hypocrisy? Covetousness? Luxury? The social relations?


(17) What is meant by his offering his bowl? From what two standpoints did he, as well as all other Gospel-Age princes, refute error? Who are meant by the solifidians? Why did antitypical Ahiezer oppose them? What argument did he use against them? With what Scriptures did he make his refutations? What was cogent and what was not cogent in his stand on justification by faith alone? Who paralleled him in a related matter?


(18) How did he refute the argument that all members of state churches were thereby Christians? The argument that infant baptism made one a subject of the Abrahamic Covenant? How did he use against the arguments of the sprinklers and effusionists his viewpoint as to conversion being a death, burial and resurrection, symbolized by immersion? How did he refute the impropriety of using physical force in producing religious belief or recantation? How did he refute the claim that baptism cleansed from original sin and worked faith in infants? How did he refute the entire sacramentarian system of the four sacramentarian denominations? What were the main Scriptures therein used? What should be our judgment as to the outcome of his refutational activity?


(19) What is meant by his offering his spoon? What is implied logically in his stewardship doctrine? How wide was the sphere of his instructions in righteousness? In what ways did he do this? What are the graces to which he exhorted? How are these related to the various forms of sin, error, selfishness and worldliness? How did he necessarily encourage in a negative way to these graces? How did he positively encourage thereto? What



effect did this have, not to be expected from his stand on solifidianism?


(20) From what other standpoint did he also offer his spoon? How was this effected as to tolerance? Religious freedom? The evangelistic spirit? What celebrated author and book show this? How did this encourage foreign missionary work? What must our judgment be as to antitypical Ahiezer's spoon?


(21) The correctness of what two things is shown by the above study? What is evidenced by the persecution of the Baptists and Unitario-Universalists by the other pertinent eight denominations? What does this study further confirm? To what should this move us?


(22) What were Asher's relations? What two meanings has the word Asher? How came Leah to give him this name? What does he type? What characteristics did the antitypical mother have and stress? Comparatively how did they stress joy and good fortune? To what degree did they stress these? How did the typical and the antitypical tribe come to its name?


(23) What kind of experiences of certain other sects did they not have? What degree of discomfort only did they have to experience? Why? What did this mean for the leaders? What kind of discomforts came to them? Unlike certain others, what did they wholly lack? Give an illustration showing the opposition of the rabble and its outcome.


(24) Who was the prince of Asher? What does Pagiel mean? Why, antitypically, was the name given? What kind of experiences of antitypical Pagiel are narrated widely among Methodists? What would the world call these experiences? What did the pious Methodists call them? Into what extremes, as to God's interventions, did such often go? From whom did they learn these methods? What does the name Ocran mean? How does this meaning apply in antitype?


(25) What spirit permeates the Methodist Church? In what has this resulted? What does this imply for its prince? How long did Wesley live and work after beginning his movement? What effect did this have on the activity of Methodism's prince? In what year and by what act did sectarianism in Wesley's movement get an



impetus? Describe that act. How long did Wesley lead his movement? Who are the seven main members of antitypical Pagiel? What were some of the activities of the first three of these? What was the character of the Wesleyan movement before 1784? What followed with it after that year? Despite what circumstance? When did it become a sect? What did Wesley's control of it effect as compared with other Little Flock movements? What do Wesley's concessions imply?


(26) Why is not the stewardship doctrine of the Methodist Church not recognized by many students of it? What similar thing prevails as to Presbyterians, Episcopalians and Baptists? What two doctrines are mistakenly advanced as Methodism's special teaching? Why so? What will enable us to see the mistake of these claims? With what must their stewardship doctrine be connected? How, from this, can we point it out? Why did Wesley stress "conversion" and the feeling of peace and joy?


(27) What is Methodism's stewardship doctrine? How do Methodists distinguish the two activities connected with their three most stressed doctrines? As what did Wesley stress sanctification? What did he usually call it? How was his view misrepresented? In what way was he partly to blame for this misrepresentation? In what publication did he give the most elaborate account of his stewardship doctrine? How did he define Christian Perfection, negatively and positively? What effect did he claim for it? What imperfection in his presentation, in principle present in the pertinent explanations of other similar brethren, do we find in his explanation of his stewardship doctrine? Why was this so? When was the matter properly explained? Why? What was the character of his central thought?


(28) What will enable us to account for his evangelistic work? What made him active toward inconsistent Church members? What resulted therefrom? Why did he and his associates stress teachings related to faith justification? What is the relation of the two doctrines connected with faith justification to the stewardship doctrine? What did this effect in their preaching?


(29) What can be said as to the suitability of these doctrines to the times? What was the 18th century as to



religion? What were its chief international activities? To what revolutions and wars did they lead? What were the leading characteristics of its aristocrats? Of its clergy in England? Of its middle class? What illustrates this? Of the lower class? How did the condition of these classes affect Wesley and his co-laborers? What was the result of these conditions on Wesley and his co-laborers? What were the results of these conditions as to their stewardship doctrine?


(30) Who was the brother who started the Little Flock movement perverted into the Methodist Church? When and where was he born? When and where did he die? Describe his parents. What did they exemplify? Who were their most distinguished sons? Wherein did they excel? What were the chief events of John Wesley's boyhood? Youth? Young manhood? What were the activities of The Holy Club? Who was their leader? What nickname did they receive? Why? What were Wesley's activities from 1729 to 1738?


(31) When, where and what were the circumstances of John Wesley's "conversion"? How does he describe it? What is the historian Lecky's estimate of this event? Who were the human instruments of it? Instead of its being his "conversion," what really was this experience? What did it begin?


(32) What henceforth became his message? Where did he first preach it? What result did it have with the clergy? What did he begin on April 2, 1739? Why did he do this? What were his largest audiences? How far did his voice clearly carry? Describe one of his most historic open-air series of services. What were not, and what were his main qualities as a speaker? How often did he preach? How did he travel and how far yearly? What did he do while riding? Describe his typical town services. How was he in his earlier years as an open-air preacher treated by the rabble?


(33) Describe his first experience with the Walsal mob. His second experience. His experience at Plymouth.


(34) Describe his experiences with mobs at Penfield and Whitechapel. Describe the two defenses of him at Bawden. Within what period were these experiences?



How in number are these related to other similar experiences? What change later set in?


(35) How was his preaching as related to other work? What was his work as a pastor? As a correspondent? As an author? What are his most noted works? On what subjects even did he write? What was his work as an editor? As a publisher? As an educator? As a builder? As a trainer of preachers? As an organizer and overseer of churches? As a conference leader? As an adviser? As a philanthropist? How, among other ways, did he accomplish so much? How numerous were his followers and adherents at his death? Wherein was he at his height of genius? With whom as such has he been favorably compared?


(36) Describe his three chief associates and his colaborers. What did their view of sanctification effect in themselves? In others? What other doctrine constructively and refutatively did their stewardship truth lead them to stress? What are the three parts of that doctrine? With whom did this make controversy? With what result to the few and the many? What was the opinion of King George III on the then four great leaders' efficiency? What does this judgment bespeak?


(37) Describe Wesley's age, his comparative achievements, his physical condition and married life. Why was his married life unhappy? What were some of its main unhappy experiences? What did it work in him? How did it end? How did his step-children stand toward his and his wife's difficulties? How did he take the news of her death? What premarital promise did she make, and then break after their marriage? What did she attempt to do? What did her failure therein effect in her?


(38) What made up for Wesley's marital woes? What was his appearance in age? What qualities contributed to his worthy appearance? How was he in his weakness supported while preaching once in his 87th year? How did this affect his hearers? How did children feel and act toward him? Until when did he continue to preach? When and to whom and why did he write his last letter? Describe his death-bed experience.


(39) What should we expect of antitypical Pagiel? Why? Of what does antitypical Pagiel's charger consist?



Along what three lines did it especially move? Why is correction of sin included in his charger? What did such correction effect in the early Methodists? What worldly amusements came under his corrections? What did he do when his corrections were disregarded? What second group of offenses did he correct? What third group of offenses did he correct? What fourth group? What fifth group? What sixth group? Why did he inveigh against these six forms of worldliness?


(40) Toward what other line of evil against his stewardship truth did antitypical Pagiel inveigh? What was the first expression of this evil to meet his rebukes? The second? The third? The fourth? The fifth? The sixth? The seventh? What other line of evils did he also rebuke? Why are not details thereon here given? What did antitypical Pagiel especially effect by his corrections?'


(41) What was antitypical Pagiel's bowl? Wherein was he weak in connection with his stewardship truth? Why so? Wherein was he strong? What ten lines of distinction did he present to refute the fusing of justification and sanctification? What did they enable him to do? In what seven ways did he refute the teaching that disinterested love is not the heart of sanctification?


(42) What was antitypical Pagiel's spoon? How did it compare with other antitypical spoons? To whom did he exhort that love be given? What things did he show regarding it? Through what things did he encourage to its practice? For what did he commend it to his hearers? In doing these things what did he accomplish? How should his spoon affect us?


(43) Who was Naphtali? What does the name mean?, Why was it given? Whom does Naphtali represent? What name had better be given these? Why? How thus would the Universalists be regarded? What have Unitarians succeeded in doing with ministers and laymen of other churches? Why does the name Naphtali fit as a typical name for them? Why are they not a child of antitypical Rachel? Why are they represented as a child of antitypical Bilhah? To what extent are they set at naught by the so-called orthodox?


(44) Who was Naphtali's prince? From what words was this name compounded? What do they mean? What



does the word Ahira mean? How does this name typically designate the crown-lost leaders of the Unitarians? What three teachings do they deny? How does this affect the opinion and attitude of their opponents toward them? How do antitypical Rachel's children view them? What true teachings have some Unitarian leaders denied? What is their view of the atonement, negatively and positively? How does the Truth treat the two views of atonement that the Unitarians and the "orthodox" oppose to one another? What does this situation reveal of the average man? What does the word Enan mean? What does its meaning typify in the Unitarian leaders?


(45) Who first sectarianized a Little Flock movement into Unitarianism? How were Laelius and Faustus Socinus related in flesh and in spirit? Whose co-laborer was Laelius Socinus? What like thing did the two Socini do? To what two countries did Faustus go? What did he do in the second of these two countries? Describe the history of Polish Unitarianism. Hungarian Unitarianism. Its chief leader. English Unitarianism. Who was the chief English Unitarian? Who were the chief three American Unitarians? Briefly describe each of these.


(46) What does the name Naphtali imply of these leaders? What were the character and effects of Socinus' writings? What is the character of Norton's Statement of Reason? Abbott's exegesis of pertinent Greek Scriptures? What was their manner in controversy? How did they in this contrast with their usual opponents? What effect had this? How did Archbishop Tillotson characterize the spirit of their debating? The manner of their debating? The words of their debating? How does he compare them with other controversialists? What did they have and lack, according to the archbishop?


(47) What kinship of spirit have the majority of the Unitarian leaders had? What do many of them deny as to our Lord's pre-existence? As to the virgin birth? As to the ransom? As to Scriptural inspiration? How do they regard the Scriptures? To what do they subordinate the Scriptures? What is their attitude on total depravity? To what extreme has this led them? What do these stands make of them now? What has their stressing God's love led them to teach? What effects has this wrought in



them? What has hindered their taking a more prominent part in many general humanitarian movements?


(48) How can the stewardship doctrine of the Unitarians be located? To what is it related? In what two ways may it be stated? Which is the preferable of these? Why? What do they deny of Jesus? Of the Holy Spirit? What, according to them, is God, and His supreme attribute? What does their stressing this attribute prove of their place about the antitypical Tabernacle? What teaching have some of them held through a one-sided emphasis on this quality? How do they reason from this attribute as to eternal torment? What has emphasis on this attribute of God moved them to do with the doctrine of the soul's immortality? What do they teach as to a future probation and its outcome for the impenitent?


(49) Against what three errors is this stewardship doctrine, a protest? When did these errors arise? Who introduced the doctrines of the soul's immortality and eternal torment among Christians? How did he come to do this? To what other error did he give a faint start? How? What evils and good did his apologies effect? Why should Unitarians fight these three errors? Why are we right in calling these three errors the fundamental errors of the nominal church? What is the fundamental doctrine of the Truth?


(50) Who begat antitypical Naphtali? When and where was he born? When and where did he die? What were the chief facts in his life until 1530? What were his experiences during 1530? What was the name and date of his first publication? What did it begin? What was his age at its publication? What is a proper estimate of this book? How were he and it regarded by Melanchthon and by Quintana? What did he do with it in 1532? What did writing against the trinity then involve? In consequence, what did Servetus have to do?


(51) Where did he turn up in 1535? Under what name? How long did he continue with this name? What did he do at Lyons? What did he find there? What did this association lead him to do? Where did he go to study medicine? Whom did he meet there? Why was Calvin there? What did Calvin seek to do with Servetus? What was arranged between them? Why did Servetus fail to



appear? Into what relation did he enter with his chief teacher? What was the latter's estimate of him? What were his activities until 1538? Where did he then go? Why? What did he do at Avignon and at Charlieu? What did he do in Sept., 1540?


(52) Who was one of his students? To what did this lead in 1541? How long did he continue there as such? What else did he there do? What was he to outward appearance? What did he do privately? What was his view and practice as to baptism? What things did he do with Calvin? What did Calvin do as to his suggestion of a visit to Geneva? How did Calvin reply to him and express himself to others on Servetus? What was given to Servetus as to Calvin's attitude? Of what did he complain? What happened with his efforts to secure publishers for his book, The Restoration Of True Christianity? Why was this? Where did he finally get a printer? How was it printed and sent away? What mistake did Servetus make? What did Calvin do about this? What did the inquisitor-general then do? What did Servetus then do? Why? Where and how did he spend the next four months?


(53) When did Servetus enter Geneva? With what purpose? How was it frustrated? What then occurred? With what was he charged? What three great injustices did he suffer in being tried? Who first appeared as his prosecutor? Who then did this? How long did the trial last? Of what did it largely consist? Wherein was Servetus, and wherein was Calvin victorious in the debate? What must we deplore in Calvin? What relative number of the judges sided with Servetus? Who also pronounced Servetus a heretic? What sentence did they expect? What was Calvin's plan? What sentence was pronounced? What three things should have prevented the entire action, beginning with Servetus' arrest? What change in the sentence did Calvin half-heartedly seek to secure?


(54) What is the date of Servetus' burning? Why was Farel introduced into the final scenes? With what effect on Servetus and on himself? What did the judges do on Oct. 27th? Where was Servetus then taken? What was done on arrival at the place of execution? What kind of



fagots were used? How were they placed? In what did this result? What mockery was indulged in? How was his burning begun? What did its first pains produce? How did he thereafter suffer? What were his last words? What did they imply?


(55) Of what was Servetus' encounter with Calvin and his churches the antitype? What two evils were manifested in the antitype? What two motives animated Calvin? What do they prove in him personally and as a representative of his church? What injury to Calvin's character is revealed by the deference shown him? What did Servetus not show him? Why did the Lord not desire it? What palliates Calvin's conduct? What must be held against him? How did his theory and practice on persecution agree? How did his inconsistency affect his character and reputation? How should we feel on this?


(56) From what and to what should we proceed? What was antitypical Ahira's charger? What do all Trinitarians do? What did his charger do to this? What did he designate this? What practice of trinitarianism did he correct? What did he do with Mariolatry? Why? What insult to the Father did he correct? Who purposed this insult? What hocus-pocus did he correct in trinitarianism? What other evil does teaching trinitarianism involve? What did he do with this? What third evil does teaching trinitarianism involve? What did he do with this? For teaching what two other errors did he correct them? With what did he charge them for such teachings? Worse than whom did they represent God thereby? What is a summary of antitypical Ahira's charger on trinitarianism?


(57) What else did antitypical Ahira correct? What is God's disinterested love? In what is this love involved? What kind of conduct, accordingly, does his charger correct? What three lines of conduct did he correct? With whom in common did he correct in these three respects? What did he thereby show? Why do we not here study the details of these three forms of corrections? What is necessary to point out here?


(58) What else did antitypical Ahira offer? What did he show the doctrine of the trinity and of the God-man to be? What did he further show of them, negatively and positively? What did he disprove of Jesus? How do the



passages that the "orthodox" use to prove Jesus' deity disprove it? How do Jesus' statements disprove it? How does the tenor of the Bible disprove it? How does its source disprove it? How is the argument for His deity based on prayer offered to Him disproved? How is the argument based on His pre-existence disproved? How is the argument based on His powers, authority, attributes and works disproved? What did antitypical Ahira do in answer to arguments that the "orthodox" base on various Scripture passages as allegedly proving the trinity? In what four ways did he meet these arguments? What will not be necessary to set forth here?


(59) What else did antitypical Ahira offer? What is it? To what did his stewardship doctrine naturally lend itself? Why? What did it enable him to do? Of what did God's love to saint and sinner become? What will this also explain? Why are details not here given?


(60) How many sections does Num. 7 contain? How may the offerings of the princes be grouped? What verses are to be studied as the final section on the princes? What does Num. 7: 84-88 give? Of what would a summary of them consist? What is a preferable rendering of v. 84? What is the altar of v. 84? What is its antitype? What is the antitype of its anointing? What is typed by the anointing of the altar before the princes offered? What illustration shows this? How did this matter stand with the Little Flock members in the other eleven movements?


(61) How will the summary of the twelve offerings be given in this study? What is the summary as to the first offering? The second? The third? The fourth? The fifth? The sixth? The seventh? The eighth? The ninth? The tenth? The eleventh? The twelfth?


(62) What special points did the preceding paragraph bring to our mind? Relatively how many Little Flock members partook in each movement? Relatively how many crown-losers partook in each sectarianizing work? Who were the antitypical altar? What was the condition on which they received their anointing? What do the twelve sets of dedication gifts type in their three kinds? What did they constitute in their three cases?


(63) Of what materials were the chargers, bowls and



spoons of all the princes made? What do silver and gold symbolize? What does this imply as to the antitypical chargers, bowls and spoons? What does this imply as to the antitypical princes' chargers, bowls and spoons? What was the weight of each charger, bowl and spoon? What is the total of the weight of each charger, bowl and spoon? What thoughts are typed by the weight of each vessel and the three vessels? Why? What is typed by the fact that their total weight is a multiple of both seven and ten? What is typed by the weight of each vessel? What is the antitype of the contrast between the silver and the gold vessels?


(64) What does v. 85 give as to weights? What are they? What is the total of its weights? What is typed by their total? What do they indicate in all the crown-losers? How is this symbolized? How does this contrast with the Little Flock's sacrifice? How is this indicated? What does the expression, shekel of the sanctuary, imply?


(65) What new thought is given in v. 86? What is typed in the ten shekels' weight? What are two things typed by the 120 shekels' weight? How so? What was the weight of all the vessels? What does this seem to suggest? What seems to be implied by this? In view of this, how should an answer in P '26, 173, be understood, and how not understood? How in this connection is the unity of the crown-retainers set forth? How the disunity of the crown-losers?


(66) What do verses 15-17 show? In how many forms were the animal sacrifices brought? What do the burnt-offerings type? The sin-offerings? The peace-offerings? What do the bullock, the ram and the lamb type in the burnt-offering? The kid of the goats in the sin-offering? The oxen, the rams, the he goats and the lambs in the peace-offering? What is typed by the lamb in the burnt-offering and in the peace-offering being one year old? What seven things prove that the crown-lost leaders of the twelve denominations are typed by the twelve princes? How do they prove this?


(67) What is not, and what is typed by the twelve-foldedness or the multiple of twelve-foldedness as including the number 6 in the types of Christ's sacrifice in this connection? What is not, and what is typed by the twelve-foldedness



or multiples of twelve-foldedness as including the number 6 in the types of the Church and its sacrifice in this connection? What is emphasized in the last sentence of v. 88? What does this type?


(68) What is the main character of our present study? What does it mainly serve? What should it effect in its student? How should we regard Num. 7? Of what is it another evidence? What gives this evidence added emphasis? To what should it lead us?


(69) What records are placed between the accounts of the princes' offerings and the Levites' consecration? Of what does Num. 7: 89 treat? Wherein did God's manner of giving revelations to Moses differ from that of those given to the high priests and prophets? What did this imply that God and Moses did to one another? What occurred in their conversations? What character has Num. 7: 89? Among other things, in what way did Moses type Christ? How did he type Him in Num. 7: 89?


(70) What does Moses in the most holy type? What does his seeking information there type? What is our Lord's relation to His teachings and works? What is typed by Moses' having access to the most holy for every need in his office? What is typed by God's always answering Moses? What is typed by Moses' always giving the needed responses as due? What kind of other information did Moses sometimes get? What did this type? What kind of things of Christ's acts will be made fully known to the Faithful of the Epiphany? What does this account teach as to the Source of all our Lord's acts and teachings?


(71) Whence came the Voice that spoke to Moses? What does the mercy seat type? What two things prove this? What do the two cherubim type? What two things prove this? What does the word glory, as applied to God, signify? What Scriptures prove this? How do they give this proof? How can we prove from Scripture that this word means a character like God's in us? What conclusion flows from these thoughts as to the meaning of the expression, cherubim of glory? What seals this proof?


(72) What were the four things above the chest of the ark? What was the Shekinah? Where is the word not found? What does it mean? What was its relation to



God? How do the Scriptures prove this? What has it been mistakenly taken to represent? What proves that it represents God? In what sense was it not God? In what sense was it God? What case is somewhat parallel to this? How is wisdom represented in connection with the top of the ark? How are God and His main attributes represented above the chest of the ark? What does that chest type? Out of what did the Voice come? How is this proved? What else types wisdom?


(73) What is the character of the symbolism of Num. 7: 89? What are the chief three things thereby represented as to God? What two things as to our Lord does it type? What does it type as to their relations to the Plan, its arrangements and works? What does it deny of the Father and the Son? What quality in our Lord does it suggest? What degree of honor for Him does it suggest? What effects in us should these considerations produce? What is the chief thought of this study?


(74) What is the antitypical character of Num. 7? What should its study effect in us? For what facts? How should we characterize v. 89? Why? How are Num. 7: 89 and 8: 1-4 related? A part of what should they form? What is the antitypical distinction between them? How is the distinction between the secret and the revealed things brought out in them?


(75) What does Num. 8: 1 imply? What charge was given Aaron in v. 2? Where is this obscure? And where clear? How does the clear rendering read? Why, firstly, was this charge given? What space was in front of the candlestick? Why, secondly, was Aaron to stand behind the lampstand when "ordering it"? Why thirdly? Why fourthly? Why fifthly? What four things in the ordering of the lampstand were exclusively Aaron's charge? What is the character of all these things?


(76) Wherein is the main antitype of Num. 8: 1-3 given What does the candlestick type? How is this proved? Whom does the under-priest type? What distinction harmonizes the seeming contradiction between these two antitypes? What example clarifies this? What do the wicks represent? What is represented by the high priest's trimming the wicks? What is typed by the brighter and



steadier light of the trimmed lamps? What results in the antitype?


(77) What was the second high-priestly activity in ordering the lampstand? What does the oil in this type represent? How is this proved? What two things does this imply? What is our High Priest's relation to them? What do the carbon and non-carbon parts of the oil represent? What does the burning of the carbon parts of the oil type? What is the process in the antitype? What are the distinctions in the view-points of Num. 8: 1-4 and Zech. 4: 2, 3, 10-13? What do the two olive trees represent? What are some of the similarities in these passages? What is the distinction between the seven pipes and the seven eyes? What is represented by the olive tree to the right? To the left? What is a brief summary of the antitype of the Zech. passage? Of the Num. passage?


(78) What was the third feature in ordering the lampstand? Whose exclusive function was this? What four activities of our Lord toward the light-bearers does this type? How does He accomplish them? In connection with what does He do these things?


(79) What was the fourth exclusive high-priestly function toward the lampstand? What proves this? What is typed by Aaron's lighting the lampstand? What is typed by this as an exclusive high-priestly function? What two evils does this condemn? What has resulted from its disregard? What two things are typed by the light being made to shine before the lampstand? How does the priest type the second of these things? What is typed by the priest's first sight in the Holy? What is typed by his seeing the light coming from the lampstand?


(80) What is typed by the high priest's not lighting the lampstand from its front? What would have been typed by his shadow, had he stood there? What is typed by his standing behind it when lighting the lampstand? What does his being relatively in the semi-shadow type? What further was typed by this position?


(81) What other high-priestly type is related to our subject? What do the Urim and Thummim type? What question has hitherto been unanswered? What Scriptures refer to them? What considerations seem to associate



them with the precious stones in the breastplate and their lights? What seemingly were they? How were the answers yes and no perhaps given?


(82) While their identity is not demonstrable, what is demonstrable of their antitypes? How do we prove the nature of their antitypes? What are they? How many graces answer to the Thummim? How are they related to God's four great attributes? How is this typed? How did the typical high priest recognize God's response by the Urim and Thummim? What does this type? What does this type reveal? Through whom does our Lord usually give God's answers to our inquiries? What three effects should these considerations work in us?


(83) What does v. 4 give? What does the candlestick's gold type? Its being beaten work? The expression, "Unto the base thereof and unto the flowers"? For what did God create the Church as the antitypical lampstand? What is the character of this study? What are its intended effects? Why? To what should this lead us?


In the wondrous breastplate golden,

Safely on His bosom holden,

See the jewels from the mine!

Amethyst and onyx wearing

Mystic marks, and each one bearing

Traces of the hand Divine.

Sapphires 'mid the gorgeous cluster

Sparkle with celestial luster,

Like the crystal dome above;

Ruby rare and topaz blending

In that glory never-ending,

Safe upon the breast of love.


Emerald and beryl throwing

Chastened hues, the fairer growing,

As the jasper blends the rays;

Chrysoprase, like king's attire,

Glowing like a star of fire,

Or a soul that loves to praise.

Who the love and pain can measure,

Ere revealed this hidden treasure,

One by one in dazzling light?

On His breast our High Priest wears them,

On His shoulder, see, He bears them,

Ever in our Father's sight.